Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to SLJ Magazine
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Dollars for Development

The President's education plan has raised the stakes on teacher training

By Walter Minkel -- School Library Journal, 9/1/2003

Comment
on this article

As if No Child Left Behind (NCLB) hasn't put enough pressure on America's educators by asking them to measure students' progress each year, President Bush's education plan is now requiring schools that receive Title I money to employ only "highly qualified" teachers or forfeit their federal funding. That means that by the beginning of the 2003–2004 academic year, educators must be certified to teach the grade levels and subjects they actually instruct. (Schools that do not receive Title I funds but receive other federal monies have until the end of the 2005–2006 academic year to comply with NCLB's requirements.) To make sure that educators get the training they need, NCLB has earmarked five percent of its Title I funds—or approximately $580 million—exclusively for professional development programs.

Joan Vandervelde, the director of online professional development at the University of Northern Iowa (UNI) in Cedar Falls, says that NCLB is forcing schools to think more seriously about professional development. "Before last year, deciding which courses to offer [in a particular school or district] was haphazard and often wasn't focused on a school building's goals," she says. Now, with the government's emphasis on well-trained, certified teachers, Vandervelde says that educators are paying a lot more attention to creating individualized professional development plans. Her own state, for example, along with Indiana and Montana have established statewide standards for professional development, and Vandervelde says that's a great way to encourage often-reluctant or budget-strapped superintendents and principals to take online professional development seriously.

UNI, for example, offers teachers needing staff-development credit a popular online children's literature course taught by Sharon McElmeel, a former school librarian who is now a children's literature consultant. As part of the rigorous course, educators are required to take part in an online discussion group, submitting at least three e-mail replies a week. Online professional development courses have some built-in benefits, says McElmeel, especially for those who are tongue-tied. "Students who might rarely or never speak up in a classroom speak up here because if they don't, they're invisible," she says. "If they don't, it's like they're not in the class at all."

While in the past, media specialists and other teachers could satisfy professional development requirements by simply coasting through a one-time-only workshop that had little relevance to their jobs—what Kirk deFord of Northwest Regional Education Laboratory (NWREL) calls "a drive-by in-service"—many teachers are now participating in longer sessions that focus on collaboration and improving student achievement. And as far as deFord, an associate of the nonprofit education corporation in Portland, OR, is concerned, it's about time. "Teachers who take a drive-by in-service know they won't be held accountable for what they learn, and often feel no special need to change the way they teach," he says.

During the 2002–2003 academic year, NWREL and nearby Lewis and Clark College launched an online school management course. Its participants—administrators and prospective administrators scattered throughout the large, rural eastern half of the state—met once in person at the beginning of the two-semester course, and then relied on conference calls, videoconferencing via the Internet, and e-mail messages to resolve some of their districts' thorniest management issues, such as how to better serve children with special needs and how to attract qualified professionals to teach math, science, and foreign languages.

Education vendors have also moved quickly to take advantage of NCLB's more stringent teaching requirements and its wealth of funding opportunities. Many of the professional development courses from vendors, such as Pearson, Classroom Connect, and Holt, Rinehart and Winston, now use streaming video—downloadable files that use RealPlayer, QuickTime, or the Windows Media Player format—to introduce or reinforce the subjects they teach. Others, including PLATO Learning and Atomic Learning, have also developed tutorials geared to educators' individual professional needs. "Everything's geared around [state] standards and kids' acquisition of those standards," says Donna Elmore, vice president of professional services at PLATO Learning and a former South Carolina school superintendent.

But Michael Simonson, a professor in the graduate school of education at Nova Southeastern University in North Miami Beach, FL, says educators need to be cautious when selecting those materials, because many of them are "repurposed from older video course materials," and may be "10 years old and out-of-date." As for the best person to evaluate those products, Simonson, Vandervelde, and Elmore think that's a no-brainer: in most schools, the library media specialist is the professional best suited for that task.

Walter Minkel is SLJ's technology editor.

 

Where the Money Is

The following federal grants are available for professional development programs:

Reading First State Grants: The U.S. Department of Education (DOE) has earmarked about $1 billion annually for the Reading First program, which is designed to help states improve the quality of reading instruction in public schools. To qualify for the funds, states must submit a plan that meets a number of criteria, including a provision for teacher training. For instance, DOE recently announced that North Carolina will receive $153.9 million in Reading First funds over six years, including $20.7 million in the first year. The state's program includes "professional training for educators in reading instruction" focused on scientifically proven methods of instruction. Texas will receive more than $500 million over the same period to fund a program with a similar focus on professional development. For additional information, visit www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/readingfirst/grant.html. Since these grants are administered through the states as a series of subgrants, however, educators should also contact their own state departments of education to find out how to apply for professional development funds.

Improving Teacher Quality State Grants: This is a formula-based federal grant program funded under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Title II, Part A. Almost $3 billion in funding is planned for these grants in FY 2004. The grants are designed to help increase the academic achievement of all students by helping schools and school districts ensure that every teacher is highly qualified. While much of this money goes to schools of education, school districts can also apply for funds that can be spent for professional development. To find out more, go to www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/AIDP/epdp.html.

Innovative Programs State Grants: Both states and districts may apply for these grants, although most previous grants under this program have gone to state DOEs. For FY 2004, $385 million has been set aside. The program targets a number of school-improvement goals, including "education programs to improve school, student and teacher performance, including professional development activities." More details may be found at www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/SST/ieps.html.

Mathematics and Science Partnership Program: This federal grant program is designed to increase the academic achievement of students in mathematics and science by enhancing the content knowledge and teaching skills of classroom instructors. It fosters partnerships between high-needs districts and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics faculty at area colleges and universities. About $100 million has been targeted for FY 2003. To learn more, visit www.ed.gov/offices/OESE/AIDP/msp.html.

State English Language Acquisition and Language Enhancement Grants: The DOE will give about $665 million to states in FY 2004 to improve the education of children with limited proficiency in English by assisting them to learn the language and meet challenging state academic content and student academic achievement standards. Approved activities under this program include professional development to assist educational personnel in meeting state and local certification requirements for teaching students with limited English proficiency. Go to www.ed.gov/offices/OBEMLA/formulafacts.html.

Source: Scott Knickelbine, vice president of Lownik Communication Services in Madison, WI.

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links




 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Photos

Blogs


Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

» VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Photos

Advertisements





SLJ NEWSLETTERS
Click on a title below to learn more.

Extra Helping
Curriculum Connections
SLJTeen
©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites