My Reviews CollectedA Selection of Kidlit Bloggers I LikeChildren's Writer/Illustrator BlogsBlogs by Children's Book EditorsChildren's Publisher BlogsBook Related in Some Way (Maybe)Podcasty GoodnessRecent Posts
Recent Comments
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (13)
Cover Discussion: Take TwoJuly 22, 2008The faithful blog failed to be faithful in my absence. So now let's redo that cover discussion I had. This time . . . with covers!
New: With the recent release of a "lost" Mrs. Piggle Wiggle title, there's been a bit of a push on the part of the publisher to get this woman back into the arms of our children. I remember fondly the Hilary Knight illustrations from my youth. I never read Eloise (everyone I know has a Do-kids-really-like-Eloise? theory), so when I think of Mr. Knight, I think of that crafty old Mrs. Piggle Wiggle and her honestly amusing (not to say lightly twisted) tales. These new covers are fine, but they lack Knight's twinkle and goofy weirdness. Ah well. So long as they get kids reading them.
New:
I didn't mind the original cover (soulful doggie stares up at you) but I like this one too. It's not flashy or sparkly, but there's something understated and cool about it. Dunno what it is. Guess I'll have to ponder it some more.
Old:
I'm rather partial to both of the paperback covers. The first one was nice, but I love the intricacy of the second two jackets. And speaking of jackets . . .
Old: ![]()
New:
![]() Interesting choice. A distinct departure from the original long outdated cover. This last one's fine, but I'm always fascinated when the cover goes from a photograph to a drawn image. Usually (at least when you go from a hardcover to its paperback edition) the opposite is true.
Old:
New:
Boy, to have been a fly on the wall when this particular decision went down. I love it! It's like they retained a slightly limp wrist and everything. A quick read of the first few pages and I discovered that little Jack had also maintained a love of cosmetics. No idea if the books are readable or merely twaddle, but to keep the wrist and the cosmetics gives me hope for the nation at large. Posted by Elizabeth Bird on July 22, 2008 | Comments (13)
July 19, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Lauren commented: I don't know if it's just me, but none of the pictures are showing up.
July 19, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Megan Germano commented: Nope, not just you. I don't see any either. (Just a confirmation for ya)
July 19, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two mhg commented: Whenever I stop into a bookstore and find books of mine, I face them outward :)
July 19, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two John Rocco commented: From what I understand, Barnes and Noble is paid premiums by the Publishers to have books face out, it is not what B&N chooses.
July 22, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Fuse #8 commented: Except in the case of Sterling, yes? B&N has direct ties to that little outfit, I do believe. Which might explain why so few libraries carry Sterling titles. I've certainly never received a catalog from them.
July 22, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Jaime Temairik commented: Yowza, Betsy. Did you get muffin crumbs in those books you took to the cafe?
July 22, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two lisa von Drasek commented: Betsy,
July 22, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Fuse #8 commented: Oh sure. I mean no offense when I mention that their display space is small. B&N is useful in terms of great swaths o' crappola. Sometimes you need to see the junky stuff being sold, so that you get a sense of what's being pushed on our young 'uns. Bank Street Bookstore, in contrast, is discriminating and has a friendly helpful staff you will not find elsewhere in this city. Plus they are located a mere ten blocks south of me, which is awfully clever of them.
July 23, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Laura Crossett commented: I loved <i>Eloise</i>. Somewhere I have a tape of my grandmother and me reading it out loud to each other. But it should be noted that I also grew up in a house where there was a ban on toys that made noises, so I'm not, I think, a representative example.
July 23, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Tristan Elwell commented: To be fair to the designers of the new cover for <I>From the Mixed-Up Files...</I>, that's not "a fake painting of nothing." It's the Tiepelo painting that actually hangs in that spot at the Met (although it may not have at the time the book was written/set, and it definitely hadn't yet been reframed to its original, irregular dimensions). Which isn't to say that both new covers aren't totally unnecessary.
July 23, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Fuse #8 commented: Tiepelo, eh? Good eye. Now I need to go fish out my copy of the book to see whether or not it's mentioned in the text. I guess you could make the argument that the sheer amount of red on the new cover is a call-back to the red border on the first jacket. Maybe maybe....
July 25, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two M.P. Barker commented: Hello, Elizabeth,
July 25, 2008
In response to: Cover Discussion: Take Two Fuse #8 commented: Excellent. I can't pinpoint what it was about those boys, but something about them screamed "Not of this century". No child model could ever look that careworn and calloused.
Advertisement
|
|