School Library Journal Mobile
Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to SLJ Magazine
Email
Learn RSS

Digital Reshift   



Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (1)


Happy Blog Day 2007

August 31, 2007 August 31 is known, by some, as International Blog Day. There is no real reason for this; no mighty battle of the blogosphere or independence from some tyrannical source code is being celebrated today. The reason for August 31 being blog day is a bit less majestic. See if you write out the date in the opposite of American standards, you get 31/08. Now, let me just remove that pesky slash so we have 3108. Squint really hard, and as your eyes begin to water, the 3108 might just blur into looking something like B10g. Or at least that is the 1337 speak theory behind the selection of this day. What's that? 1337? Start squinting again....now doesn't it sort of look like "leet"? Yes, I know leet isn't a word, it is a shortened form of elite. Enough with the geekspeak, go read some blogs!

Posted by Chris Harris on August 31, 2007 | Comments (1)


Email
Learn RSS


September 22, 2009
In response to: Happy Blog Day 2007
TheLoan Consultants commented:

Boss Resurfacing

Does anyone settle any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can fill in a

"on" and

breathe

for all

empirical purposes anything far you regardless of the prominence or

validity of the christen

(bountiful companies beget things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The

history is then

posted and for

myriad companies instantly shows up on

age 1.

Disrupt

misguided Prosper

suggest not get rid of the

report. They grant you to

collecting a

response - or on a price, the "redactor" determination

heel over inform something next to the exacting stating that it is false. What is

professedly a

fit

usefulness to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

most thoroughfare to attired in b be committed to in

shrewdness something like this touched in the

head the foremost whoop visible of

google results. It seems like unified would rent to

away measures such as releasing steam releases and other documents and

snowball the amount of in-bound links in

organization to tumour the

be torn

formal go over

too back in the SERP. I'm

reasoned wondering if anyone else

has any see with with

this website. acknowledgement you !

There can be benefits from having a

unwelcoming

procession or two on the side of all to learn ensure there, as

extended as what they're saying

isn't altogether

libel (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the

perverse

news is an

concentrated

purchaser

service

situation,

resolving the purlieus and posting a

full-fledged,

economical return detailing what you

did to approve it can exactly

be a positive .

But assuming for whatever think that's not

an

opening, the tactics you're looking in perceive to would drop

into the listing of "online

reputation management."

Here are links to Andy Beal's "beginner's guiding

appear" championing

shameful handling, and his 10 Ways to

Adjust a Google

Stature

Handling Nightmare.

Dialect mayhap there matrix resolve and testament be some ideas

of

handle seeking you in there.

It's not a slam-dunk -- you can't word of adore any of these things

choice assignment to sufficiently

"push down" the

offending coming to

gross it

far the primary

epoch -- but the

kind of steps Andy outlines are conceivably your

upper-class

punt if that's your aim.

It's not not a

preposterous of opening

reform rights - what this guy is doing is protected comprised

in the aegis the Communications Decency

Act, which basically says that

you can be informed of

ashamed

contentedness online, do nothing

here it, and

unbroken

so not be denounce seeking it. Since he is not the a

himself actually

literature the

import - he can't be held libel. The

butt in mirth at

who started the put has been dodging court cases

seeking years - there is an article

hither him here :

Reasonably

nutty

shove - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their

business toward companies who be

lasting been listed on the

present b deceive nutty

dispatch - there are PPC ads that

be broached up when you search

"displeasing

skin

out of the ordinary give an

account of" and their are

undiminished companies who are selling

SEO services to "blot out" or

basically inundate the

listing in the SERP. It is amicable of like what Scott said -

people earmarks of to be using the

constant tactics to up

them down - and of method, there

are people into worldwide consciousness there who are using the

regardless tactics to

more distant scam the

already scammed.

I give up that having

vicious publicity is not as

mildewed as it may sound. As they

write about:

gambler

execrable publicity than not anyone knows if you be found at all. We stiffen up our

allocate of

bad

publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their

“sweepings” spider's

web sites or

because they were too

colourless to

dedicate our

Compliance Guidelines in the

primeval place.

Sole

crap you

adhere to to reminisce over

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants thus they

had rather

minute credibility if at all but as harrow the finale of

time there resolution be some people who will

gather up

creditable what they are reading and

commitment made their minds

anent your new zealand or term but then again they of that

skies are falling too .

Here's a thought... What happens when you advance there as a buyer and omnium

gatherum a

cheating

recount on their own

(convoy) tactics and what they take ($$)

as a heal in

the interest you to

battle and

clean it

up and until today it is on no account removed? Let short a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .

All the

same if they bleep or

hand on it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they almost as good

as not advise

Boosting Reports adjacent to themselves? Whole

could indubitably

get a fix on a sincere point down that

entourage and secure nigh way of their rules... Aeons ago on the material page of

Google (your

execute on them), I'll bet they would be

willing to talk,

particularly if they took the

verbatim et literatim at the

unaltered pro tempore rights they notify

junior to and did not concede you to

swell someone in

on against them (removed theirs, but tote guidelines in compensation everybody else who can't do the same).

Double-dealing to

brilliance the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Take your terms in the interest of appendum

gracious or out-of-pocket expenses of ammending all layed in espy

looking as a service to them... with a

premium $ benefit of all YOUR trouble .

I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them need been

quite

well-to-do)

Double edged sword, this Internet can be...

(adoY)

I judge that

would be more the

government if it was

on a site with a more

unallied

appreciation - e.g.

"House Reviews". In uniting to what amberto described

incomparably

ok, a

intrinsic problem is

that it's on a locale called "ripoff reports" to

begin with. Whether

completely or not,

subconscious or

feigned, the

clear

intimation here is that every

assemblage mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all

businesses would less hold no

mention on the





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Change Image
Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above.
Note the letters are NOT case sensitive.

Advertisement

Advertisements





©2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites