Libraries, Schools Join In - School Library Journal
Log In to your Account                Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to SLJ Magazine


ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in a few seconds.

Articles

An Internet Safety Bill That Librarians at Last Can Love

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
RSS |

Joan Oleck -- School Library Journal, 12/14/2007

From the folks who brought you the failed Deleting Online Predators Act (DOPA) and the successful but little loved Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), comes a legislative initiative that librarians may love.

 

It's a proposed $25 million to 50 million worth of grants over five years designed to boost Internet safety education rather than limitations on who can view what online.

 

The main problem is deciding who will get the grants. Squabbling has erupted among online safety organizations over that issue.

 

The House funding bill, H.R. 4134, sponsored by Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA), actually passed November 13, while S. 2344, sponsored by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), is scheduled for mark-up this week. The American Library Association (ALA) approves. The ALA "has consistently promoted education as the most effective route to Internet safety," says Lynne Bradley, director of the Office of Government Relations.

 

The Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT), which aims to preserve democratic values in the new digital world, echoed the ALA this week, issuing a recommendation of "strongly supports" for passage of the Senate bill.

 

The funding initiative is "precisely the type of child safety bill that Congress should be passing," CDT added in its email to supporters. "Two blue-ribbon panels established by Congress to investigate how best to protect children in the online environment concluded that the most effective way to protect kids online is to combine education with the voluntary use of filtering and other technology tools to empower parents to decide what content their children should access," CDT wrote.

 

Importantly, the two bills differ on how they would distribute funds. The House bill would appropriate $25 million with i-SAFE specifically named as a recipient. i-SAFE is a nonprofit foundation which combines classroom curriculum and community outreach to promote online safety. Competitive grants offered through 2012 and "subject to the availability of the funds" would be disbursed to other organizations; but there is no guarantee that funds would be available after the disbursement to i-SAFE, at the discretion of the U.S. Attorney General.

 

The Senate bill, in contrast, offers an open grant competition "to provide for age-appropriate Internet education." Activists and groups not named as recipients of guaranteed funds have banded together into a coalition pushing for the Senate version of the bill. They include the Consortium for School Networking, the Family Online Safety Institute, WiredSafety.org, and others.

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
RSS |




Reader Comments (0)


Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information

 
Advertisement

SLJ Reviews Database

SLJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories


From the Blogs


Advertisements




Connect with SLJ


Follow on Twitter






About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | For Reviewers | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.