Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to SLJ Magazine
A Fuse #8 Production   


Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Most Commented On

Archives

Blog

Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (7)


Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
July 27, 2007

(CONTINUED FROM PART ONE)

Rowling has suggested that someday she may return to the world o' Potteria. She certainly leaves that door open with this book, and I'm okay with that. If it means following the adventures of Albus Severus Potter (are the initials "ASP" a parseltongue coincidence?) then I'm happy to do so. I think it's fairly clear that our days with Harry proper are done. Where Rowling chooses to go next, I'll follow. There are reasons why she's adored by children and adults alike. This book is one of them.

Notes on the Cover:
Well, obviously the British one (shown here) is lame.  Lamedy lame lame lame.  I'm sorry, but some artist read through this entire book and said to themselves, "AH HA! The Gringotts scene!  What a magnificent final cover THAT would make!"  Really?  Not Harry and the silver doe Patronus?  Not Harry facing down Voldemort for the last time?  Not Harry snogging Ginny, for pete's sake?  The adult cover (shown at the beginning of this review) is the prettiest.  Let's not begrudge the lovely American cover, though.  The color scheme alone should win it awards (which will not happen since it sells well).  Of course, I'm still not quite sure what GrandPre was drawing here.  What are Harry and Voldemort looking at?  And where are they?  A little help please.

Misc:
There is an amusing look at the newest Harry Potter in brief found via Educating Alice. Via Eric Berlineconomics of Harry Potter. New info on what Rowling's writing next. And Dan directed me to the Onion AV Club's spoiler-rific review of the new book.  It was created in a live blogging format while reading the book.  Quite possibly my favorite review of this title out there.  And my favorite Deathly Hallows song goes directly to darling Hank Green (how'd he pick up on the dead Hedwig and broken nose importance?)


Posted by Elizabeth Bird on July 27, 2007 | Comments (7)


July 27, 2007
In response to: Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
b commented:

jacket image on US version: the showdown between Voldemort & Harry takes place at sunrise [orange sky] in the great hall, and the moment pictured is just after Harry disarms him and the wand flies up into the air, and Harry [and V] reach up to catch it. The moment he catches it is when Voldemort dies, which makes it a very compelling scene to select. The only small problem is that it appears to be an outdoor space with some kind of wall, instead of an indoor space because she had to depict the enchanted ceiling as sky, which is a bit confusing but makes sense. It was and is by far my favorite cover of the 3 versions, despite the tai chi jokes people were making when it first was shown. [ I still cannot comprehend how that Gringotts version got approved!] nice review! I'd also like to add that amidst the carnage and despair there were still a small amount of good laughs & funny lines. Not a laugh riot, but enough to keep things at a certain level.




July 27, 2007
In response to: Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
bookbk commented:

Brava! Nice review indeed. I also found the interminable wanderings in the woods very hard to take--more excruciating than the many deaths, in fact.




July 30, 2007
In response to: Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
Jennie commented:

I found this book absolutely hysterical. The funniest of the 7, I think, and that really surprised me (in a good way). I was often laughing, whooping for joy (c'mon Neville's Gran kicking some Death Eater butt?) and sobbing all at the same time. But, like you, I feel like someone has left me behind. I don't think I entirely realize that Harry & co aren't real. And I'm OK with that.




July 30, 2007
In response to: Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
Laura commented:

I was satisfied, yes...but I still wanted more resolution. The Hallows concept annoyed me to no end. I think Rowling had all she could handle settling the Horcrux issue, ending the Dark Lord's reign, fitting in romance, battle scenes...why add the Hallows issue? I just felt like it was superfluous. On the whole, though, I enjoyed it. I laughed, I cried, and Rowling still managed to surprise me after all these years (Hedwig?!?!?!).




July 30, 2007
In response to: Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
MotherReader commented:

Thank you for a good and through review. Not that I wouldn't expect that of you in general, understand, but for this book many people are being so careful that the reviews are useless. That said, I made sure not to read your post - or almost anything - until I had finished the book. The Tonks and Lupin deaths annoyed me as trying to make some sort of death quota. And I've never seen Mrs. Weasley as Sigourney Weaver in Aliens. Little off-style there. Overall, though, satisfying seems a good term.




July 30, 2007
In response to: Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
klonghall commented:

I've been avoiding this review, too. I finally finished the book about 20 min. ago. I'm very happy with the ending, which is rare for me with series I love this much. I'd like to know, though, how Neville got that sword??? Did I miss something? I burst into tears as I finished the last line. You see, my mother passed away last month. She loved this series as much as I, and was bewildered by the ending of "Half-Blood Prince." She really believed that Snape was one of the good guys. She was really looking forward to the resolution. She'd be so glad to see she was right about him.




July 31, 2007
In response to: Review of the Day: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)
eyow commented:

klonghall - Neville got the sword because he is a true Gryffindor, and he needed it. Remember when Harry pulled it out of the Sorting Hat in the Chamber of Secrets, and Dumbledore told him that only a true Gryffindor could have done that? Same thing. It also means that Griphook the goblin was lying about the sword really belonging to a goblin.





POST A COMMENT
Display Name or Registered Users Login Here.
Please restrict submissions to less than 7,000 characters (including any HTML formatting).

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above:


Advertisement

Advertisements





©2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites