My Reviews CollectedA Selection of Kidlit Bloggers I LikeChildren's Writer/Illustrator BlogsBlogs by Children's Book EditorsChildren's Publisher BlogsBook Related in Some Way (Maybe)Podcasty GoodnessRecent Posts
Recent Comments
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (36)
Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-ramaJanuary 14, 2009I decided to release them a little early this year. If I know my committee members, and I think I do, they'll be rereading and tying themselves into variously sized knots in preparation for the upcoming ALA Youth Media Awards. From this haze of literature and debatable topics ("what really makes something 'distinguished' anyway"?) they will sit themselves down soon and bestow upon a few lucky souls the most prestigious children's literary awards in America. I'm fair faint and giddy in expectation. NEWBERY WHAT WILL WIN
CALDECOTT
WHAT WILL WIN
Wabi Sabi by Mark Reibstein, illustrated by Ed Young - I'm the kind of person who always bets that the Oscar will go to the most likely frontrunner too. Now the last time a book that you had to hold vertically won an award it was back in 1996 for Tops and Bottoms by Janet Stevens. That book really used the format well, and Wabi Sabi faces justifying its vertical state. I have little doubt that dedicated committee members could find a good reason for it where I falter. The other bit of trouble is whether or not they consider the book something a reader can relate to. That said, I think it has an extraordinary shot.
AND IN BRIEF . . .
CORETTA SCOTT KING AWARDS
CARNEGIE
WHAT WILL WIN: The Hunger Games, sure. But I suspect that if it gets anything it'll just be an honor. Just a guess, though. GEISEL
BATCHELDER
ODYSSEY
SIBERT WHAT WILL WIN: We Are the Ship by Kadir Nelson. Whew! I wouldn't mind seeing an award or two go to Astronaut Handbook, United Tweets of America, or Boys of Steel either, though.
SCHNEIDER FAMILY BOOK AWARD
WHAT WILL WIN: Possibly She Touched the World, which is also a big Sibert contender. Miss Spitfire by Sarah Miller also has an excellent chance. We shall see. Posted by Elizabeth Bird on January 14, 2009 | Comments (36)
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Tarie (Into the Wardrobe) commented: Moribito: Guardian of the Spirit by Nahoko Uehashi was translated from Japanese into English by Cathy Hirano. I want that to win the Batchelder!
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Monica Edinger commented: I put my Newbery druthers in a post on my blog titled "Thoughts on Newbery: Appeal" and came to a different conclusion from you re The Hunger Games. I also have a bunch more suggestions for the Sibert: The Lincolns (Fleming), Ain't Nothing But a Man (Nelson/Aronson), River of Words (Bryan/Sweet), and Christo and Jeanne-Claude: Through the Gates and Beyond (Greenberg/Jordan).
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Trisha commented: I agree with Tarie about Moribito for the Batchelder. Unless the committee, following similar logic to the Caldecott scenario you mention above, decides they don't want to honor two Japanese books with related manga in a row. In which case I'll say Valerie Zenatti's A Bottle in the Gaza Sea, if only because of the timeliness of the subject.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Brenda Ferber commented: So fun to read your predictions!
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Roger Sutton commented: Your comments re why We Are the Ship won't win the Caldecott remind me of the year a nice Mormon girl whose talent was playing the harp won Miss America. Following Vanessa "Penthouse" Williams.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: Aw, shoot. I forgot about "River of Words". That was actually going to be a Wild Card choice. I may have amend the list accordingly. Thanks for the reminder. And Moribito. I too forgot about that. It would be delightful if it won. Fingers are now firmly crossed.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Wendy commented: I still fail to understand what's distinguished--remotely--about The Willoughbys.<br><br>
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: Indeed yes. I didn't give it much credit, but in the Mock Caldecotts around the country Jim Averbeck's spreadsheet shows that it's won some serious love. Personally I think it may have a better shot at the Sibert.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Jim commented: Ah! The Great Yellow Room Debate continues. Some people have said that's what they find intriguing, others have said "huh?"
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Melissa commented: Fascinating thoughts. (I'm just impressed that I've read a good number of books on that list this year...) It'll be interesting to see how right/wrong you are. ;)
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama tim b commented: What? No Eric Rohmann kitten book? This is what happens when people give us good stuff in February: it's all forgotten by the following year...
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Orbit commented: What about the Pura Belpre? Any predictions there?
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: Is there a Pura Belpre this year? I thought they gave it out last year and this year there wasn't anything. Mind you, I could be wrong about that. And I didn't exactly forget about the kitten book Tim . . . I dunno. It's a great book. I'm just not sure about its staying power. Then again I showed it to my homeschooler bookgroup and they all agreed that it was far superior to many other titles up for contention. So there's that . . .
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama douglas florian commented: I would add "One Boy" to the mix. Written and illustrated by Laura Vaccaro Seeger, it garnered three starred reviews for starters and is brilliant.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Susan (Chicken Spaghetti) commented: <p>I predict that the Caldecott will go to "We Are the Ship."</p><br>
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Malikka commented: Abe's Honest Words illustrated by Nelson interacts better with the text than the images in We Are Ship, thought they are both amazing. His work in Moses should have earned him a Caldecott last year, but Hugo Cabret was so different. Also this is the 200th anniversary of Lincoln's birth. I don't think that will go unnoticed by the committee, but who knows for sure.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Doret commented: Do you think the books that won't win but should have a chance at an honor?
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Cynjay commented: My 11 year old LOVES Hunger Games with a passion - apparently, it is the best book ever and he has pressed it into the hands of every sixth grader he can find. It feels that sometimes people who categorize things as strictly "teen" and ignore the pre-teens haven't met either recently.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Brooke commented: Eh, I think the Siebert's more likely to go to Candace Fleming's new book about the Lincolns, David Macaulay's <i>The Way We Work</i>, Gina Capaldi's <i>A Boy Named Beckoning</i> (awesome use of primary source material!), or even possibly the Nic Bishop/Ellen Jackson <i>The Mysterious Universe</i> (eh, at least for an honor. They've gotten one together before, for <i>The Tarantula Scientist</i>). Nelson's work has all the charm, but I think it runs into the same problem as <i>The Trouble Begins at 8</i>: the vernacular tone makes it difficult to separate fact from anecdote, and also to tell when things happened. Which, to me, seems to be the kinda thing that would irk the Siebert committee.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama MotherReader commented: I'm going with Boycott Blues or Piano Starts Here for illustration in the Coretta Scott King Awards. Bird or Stitchin' and Pullin: A Gee's Bend Quilt for author.
January 14, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Yuyi commented: I commented before but I don't see my post. Please disregard this one if it end up to be a repeat.
January 15, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: That's good to know! I hadn't heard of the annual change. These will bear consideration then. I'll give them some thought. Does anyone else have a suggestion?
January 15, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Matt commented: Diamond Willow! Why does the ancestors-as-animals sink it? Is that bad? I thought it added another layer to an already multi-layered story. And We Are The Ship NOT getting the Caldecott? I think you could put that book on every list and it has a shot!
January 15, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Chrisin NY commented: I always love reading your predictions!
January 15, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama working illustrator commented: What is the point of having these awards if not to reward the ambition and scale of achievement it takes to make a book like We Are the Ship? I realize that there's a set of rules here - and a near-Talmudic body of exegesis on them - but honestly: is there really a picture book published last year that we'd rather see in every library in America? And thanks, Brooke (a few comments back) for remembering Candace Fleming's Lincoln book, which I think is good, accessible, reader-friendly history that doesn't seem watered-down. I can't imagine how long it took her to get permissions lined up for all those images...
January 15, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: I can't resist a shameless plug here. If you like Candace Fleming's book, then why not see her live and in person at my Children's Literary Cafe on Saturday, February 7th at 2:00? She will be presenting for us in the South Court auditorium, talking about "The Lincolns" and what she did to get those permissions you mentioned. At the Humanities and Social Science Library.
January 19, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama laurasalas commented: United Tweets of America--who'd have thought a book about the state birds could be so much fun. Not me, until I read this a couple of months ago.
January 20, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama a teacher commented: Is Neil Gaiman allowed to win? Is he American? I thought there was some silly rule regarding that . . .
January 20, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: The stipulation is that you have to be an American resident. And I believe he is currently located in Minnesota, so there you go. By the same token, Cornelia Funke could win something since she's in L.A. And Oliver Jeffers could now someday win a Caldecott . . . you see how it goes.
January 20, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama a teacher commented: Then by all means, Give the Gold to Gaiman!
January 21, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama a teacher commented: Are these announced Monday?
January 21, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: Monday, yep. Monday Monday Monday.
January 21, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Claire commented: Isn't the difficulty with The Graveyard Book that one of the chapters was published previously as a short story in "M is for Magic"? My understanding is that disqualifies it for the Newbery.
January 21, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: That's entirely up to the decision of the committee chair. If they're hardcore then yes, it could be disqualified for that very reason. But there's a precedent for similar books of this nature, and it all comes down to how exactly the chair wants to interpret the rules. My vote is that they don't disqualify, but I could be completely wrong.
January 26, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama John commented: Wow, you are reall off on predictions.
January 26, 2009
In response to: Newbery & Caldecott 2009: Predict-o-rama Fuse #8 commented: I have good and bad years. I had no idea they'd go with Engle, though. I mean, she's great but below 14?
Advertisement
|
|