Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Most Commented On
Archives
Blog
Link This | Email this | Blog This | Comments (9)
Spring Fling?September 29, 2008Savvy and Shooting the Moon are two titles that I heard a lot about this spring, and which some of you mentioned as soon as we said we were looking for titles. Both of these books have engaging voices, and well-paced and compelling narratives. They are fun and well done. Are they distinguished? I've yet to have someone convince me, using the Newbery Terms and Criteria. I find both titles suffer in endings that don't quite deliver...or that just deliver a slightly shabbier version of what was promised--like getting the wrong bike for your birthday. It's true that they are strong spring titles...and it can be difficult sometimes to locate the measure of a "distinguished" book among spring returns. Posted by Nina Lindsay on September 29, 2008 | Comments (9)
September 29, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Franki commented: I LOVE Shooting the Moon and have Savvy on my pile because I keep hearing such great things about it. Not sure if either meets Newbery criteria but how about Greetings from Nowhere by Barbara O'Connor? I'd like to throw that one in as a possibility. I think people have forgotten about it since it was out so early.
September 30, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Roger Sutton commented: I think the weighting of big-buzz books into the fall has more to do with the opening of school and the November-December holidays, yes?
September 30, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Nina commented: Roger, I would think that the school year and the holidays has more to do with fall releases too...but publishers have told me explicitly that "
September 30, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Nina commented: [sorry, flubbed by my own technology]. Roger, I would think that the school year and the holidays have more to do with fall releases too...but publishers have told me explicitly that since the Newbery winners tend to be fall releases, they hold their Newbery picks for the fall. The logic escapes me.
September 30, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? mia commented: I personally felt that one of the strengths of Savvy was that it had enough plot points to hook a reader initially, yet not spoil the outcome, as in those instances when you see the best parts of a movie in its trailer. I also thought that the language was humorous, rich in vocabulary, and sounded pleasant in my head (as I think it would out loud). The characters were dynamic. I thought that the book treated religion in an interesting way, in that strong beliefs and church community could co-exist with secret magical super powers, rather than being presented as mutually exclusive. I hope these thoughts are helpful!
October 1, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Priscilla commented: I read Shooting the Moon and loved it, but I had a strong and lingering sense that another book could easily come along and overshadow it. I felt the ending gave the book its solidity. I just finished the Adoration of Jenna Fox and thought it was powerful and intriguing. Can it be considered for a Newbery? I would like to think so.
October 1, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Mary commented: I enjoyed Savvy and Shooting the Moon, but I was much more impressed with Henkes' Bird Lake Moon. It has powerful evocation of place, rich and complex characterization, and skillfully portrayed believable responses to difficult life situations.
October 1, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Amy commented: I think the publishers are wrong. I know for a fact that when I was on Newbery, the books I had time to re-read were the ones I got the earliest. They were also the ones I devoted the most time to, as I waited for those big boxes to arrive and force me to rush through later readings.
October 1, 2008
In response to: Spring Fling? Nina commented: Jenna Fox can be considered as long as the author is a US Citizen or resident, which I believe she is. The committee would discuss whether they think this is a distinguished book for children through age 14. Newbery and Printz consideration are not mutually exclusive. Each committee is separate and each committee determines how well a book fits their criteria.
Advertisement
|
|