Libraries, Schools Join In - School Library Journal
Log In to your Account                Free Newsletter Subscription
Subscribe to SLJ Magazine


ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in a few seconds.

Articles

Feds Finally Get One Right: Kids' Books Exempt from Lead Law

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
RSS |

By SLJ Staff August 2, 2011

cpsia(Original Import)Although members of Congress may have stopped short of a group hug, they were nearly unanimously on the same page. By a vote of 421-2, the House of Representatives passed an amendment to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) that excludes "ordinary" children's books and learning materials from testing for lead content. And the Senate quickly followed suit in a voice vote, sending the bill on to President Obama to sign into law.

The unexpected vote comes as a welcome relief for publishers and the American Library Association (ALA), who had argued for the past three years—ever since CPSIA was enacted in August 2008—that kids' books didn't pose a threat to public safety. "We're very grateful to the Congress for recognizing that library books present no danger to children and for passing legislation which frees school and public libraries from unnecessary regulation," says Emily Sheketoff, executive director of ALA's Washington Office.

CPSIA was originally enacted to protect children from the dangers associated with products containing high levels of lead by establishing lead standards and testing requirements, but the Consumer Product Safety Commission had interpreted CPSIA to apply to all children's books. If Congress had not approved the recent amendment, libraries would have been required to restrict access to their children's book collections.

This article originally appeared in the newsletter Extra Helping. Go here to subscribe.

E-Mail This Link


Enter recipient's e-mail:


Close
Email
RSS |




Reader Comments (3)


Maybe next they'll take up powersports. The CPSIA has severly crippled the market for junior dirtbikes (kid's motorcycles), because, you know, kids might eat motorcycles. Last I checked motorcycles aren't food, guess Congress still hasn't figured that out.



Posted by Mike on August 8, 2011 04:10:12PM

Who were the two Congressvermin that voted against passage?



Posted by Dan W. on August 9, 2011 08:48:53AM

It appears that the "no" votes were Dennis Kucinich, D-OH & Bobby Rush, D-IL. Maybe they fell asleep & hit the wrong button? Got confused over what "no" meant? http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/1/68 3



Posted by MDixon on August 9, 2011 01:48:17PM

Previous | Next

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or antisocial behavior such as "spamming", "trolling", or any other inappropriate material will be removed from the site. We will take steps to block users who violate any of our terms of use. You are fully responsible for the content you post. All comments must comply with the Terms and Conditions of this site and by submitting comments you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Your name: *

Your email address: * (We won't publish this.)



* = Required information

 
Advertisement

SLJ Reviews Database

SLJ Reviews Center

Latest Stories


From the Blogs


Advertisements




Connect with SLJ


Follow on Twitter






About Us | Advertising Information | Submissions | Site Map | Contact Us | For Reviewers | RSS | Subscriptions
©2011 Media Source, Inc., All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc. Media Source Inc.